Humanity, replication, whose work is protected

 Studio gibli

 

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/hayao-miayazaki-openai-studio-ghibli-1236177598/?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us

 

"And why not? Miyazaki’s creations reflect a bespoke, unique aesthetic, arrived at from thousands of hours of human labor and good old-fashioned dreaming. The idea of merging that with photos from our last family trip to Disneyland — using nothing more than a few keystrokes — can prove too enjoyable to resist.

ADVERTISEMENT

Of course a certain irony abided in a machine generating images to honor someone who so meticulously drew them with his own fingers. Miyazaki himself has decried AI’s use in art — “I strongly feel this is an insult to life itself,” he said in 2016, non-gently, a point that when juxtaposed with so many people unleashing the tool in homage to his work turned their act hilarious and a little cringe.

This is all happening even as a federal judge has greenlit The New York Times‘ lawsuit against OpenAI for training ChatGPT on scores of its articles without permission, underscoring the copyright issues at play. Technically OpenAI, aware at least optically of infringement concerns, programmed the image tool not to allow the imitation of a specific artist. But it enacted no such rule for a studio, and so our feeds were soon overrun by a Ghibli aesthetic. " 

 . . . 

"GKIDS, Ghibli’s U.S. distributor, offered slightly lower-key shade when, upon announcing a new Imax restoration of Miyazaki’s 1997 historical fantasy Princess Mononoke, the company’s distribution vice-president Chance Huskey dryly noted that “In a time when technology tries to replicate humanity, we are thrilled that audiences value a theatrical experience that respects and celebrates Hayao Miyazaki and Studio Ghibli’s masterpiece in all its cinematic hand-drawn glory.”"


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

 Notes on Still Exhausted Introduction 11:  While these advancements have arrived with their share of hype and grift, there is no doubt computers will increase their capacity to generate convincing images and speech at a click. Always engines of simulation and doubling, our ever-theatrical computational systems have become expert mimics of human visual art and language. AI thus presents intriguing questions about our relationship to falsity, the semiotics of language, and the crumbling liberal fantasy of authentic subjectivity ( Jucan 2023 ; Dixon-Román and Amaro 2021 ; Jarvis 2021 ). But the actors of SAG-AFTRA were not marching from existentialist commitment. They marched for their interests. They posed the duality of computers v. performance, like so many Hollywood stories of doppelgängers, as antagonistic. As SAG-AFTRA President Fran Drescher put it: “What is our business, our gestures, our likeness, our acting, our voices? That’s what we’re selling. That’s who...
Read more
 robots that are stupid on purpose, not built to pass  “We can play off the fact that it will be, inevitably, to some degree, stupid,” she suggests. What the researchers need to figure out is “where stupidity is harmful.” Unlike most other gadgets, robots get our social instincts tingling. Of course, explains Šabanović, “what distinguishes robots is that they have a body.” She adds, “They can move, show they’re paying attention, trigger us.” Children learn more from a robot than a screen. Adults trust robots more readily than computers. Dogs obey their commands.   The roboticists I talk to all point to an influential paper by Amanda Lazar, a professor of human-computer interaction at the University of Maryland. Lazar described in 2017 how the field of human-computer interaction might learn from new thinking about dementia and the mind. Going way back to René Descartes, human cognition has conventionally been defined around...
Read more